Wednesday, September 16, 2009

City Council Sets Tax Request

The Blue Hill City Council met on Tuesday, September 15. The 2009-10 Personal & Real Property Tax Requirement Request amount in the proposed 2009-10 Budget was set at $101,000. This amount is unchanged from the previous several years. The 2008 Property Tax Rate was 0.369443. The 2009 Proper try Tax Rate has been set at 0.357187. The decreased rate is due to increased property valuation within the city limits. There was no public discussion on the tax request during the Tax Request Hearing. Tim Eiseman addressed the board with concerns of traffic speed on the newly paved South West Railway street and considerations for correcting the issue. Eiseman also discussed additional breeds of dogs that he feels should be added to Ordinance No. 615. The council will review both concerns and address them at a later date. Sylvia Alber addressed her concerns with Mayor Schunk's lack of compliance with a city ordinance. Subject was discussed. Notice of the City Council's vacancy resulting from the recent recall election will be published in the Blue Hill Leader and will be posted at City Hall, the Post Office, and the Community / Senior Center. Interested candidates should contact Mayor Keri Schunk. Schunk should present her nomination to the City Council on Tuesday, October 13. A lengthy discussion was held on personnel policies to be included in a new personnel policy manual for city employees. A revised draft of the policies will be submitted, again, in October. Discussion was also held on a new health insurance program offered by the Nebraska League of Municipalities. Additional information was requested. Discussion was held on old lease agreements between the city and Burlington Northern Railroad. The downtown park, some utility accesses, and three of the four wells to the north of Blue Hill all reside on Railroad right-of-way. BNSF has transferred management of the properties to Railroad Management Company. The city will pay the requested lease amount on one of the tracts but has suggested additional information before submitting a payment on the other tracts. An amendment was made to the wording of Ordinance No. 622 dealing with electric rates. Customers who have meters on the primary side of the system owned transformers will now receive a 1.5% discount on their energy costs instead of on their total billing. Discussion was held on certain dogs in the community that have demonstrated aggressive tendencies. Discussion was also held on contractual opportunities and what government agency is responsible for animal control. Discussion was held on proposed improvements to the ball fields. The council requested additional research. Additional items discussed were recent work on Hickory Street, upcoming Boy Scout / Cub Scout activity, pest control services, the city's website, and personnel review of the Deputy City Clerk.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

It would mean a little more if the person complaining about the parked car actually took care of there own property.

Anonymous said...

It would be great if the mayor and council would set a better example. If they want to set the rules they should be willing to abide by them. What a bunch of hypocrites!! Come on Mayor obey the law..

Anonymous said...

Andy Alber was held to a higher standard because he was on the council. He should not have said the things about Blue Hill that he did so he was recalled. No one is saying the mayor should be recalled but that she should set the example and not feel that just because of her position she is above the law or that she should not have to abide by the ordinances that she puts into place. We also have other council members that feel they are not bound by the same rules that the rest of the community is. I think that is the real issue here. WHY ARE THERE TWO SETS OF RULES??

Anonymous said...

It is because of ignorant people like the ones that are commenting on this that no one runs for council. They offer their time to the city for pennies on the hour & people critisize their every move. Who gives a damn about a parked car. Do you really think a car looks wosre than a ran down house, a yard that isn't mowed, a house under construction for years. The answer is no. The town should spend more time worrying about what is important & less about stuff that has no effect on the future of Blue Hill. Blue Hill is as good of small town as you will find. I'm sure a lot of towns wish all they had to worry about is the petty stuff people worry about in Blue Hill.

Anonymous said...

The word Ignorant defined.
1. Destitute of knowledge; uninstructed or uninformed; untaught; unenlightened. [1913 Webster]

He that doth not know those things which are of use for him to know, is but an ignorant man, whatever he may know besides. --Tillotson. [1913 Webster]

Prehaps it is the author of the last post who is ignorant, apparently not knowing that the question is not where one parks ones car but whether or not one obeys the law.

Prehaps the real message the author would like to send is," This is Blue Hill, who gives a damn about the law?."
Obviously that is not high on the list of priorites for the residents of Blue Hill or the members of the city council who disregard the laws and the need for law enforcement.

Some of us believe that no one wants to run for city council because It is a thankless job, that requires a great deal of effort if it is to be done well.
There are plenty of people ready to critize but no one will bother to praise a job well done. Let us point out it is much easier to be critical than to be correct. Especially when the criticizing is being done by ignorant people.

Anonymous said...

is it that hard to just abide by the rules?? If so then change the rule.